Sex differences in the relationship of hip strength and functional performance to chronic ankle instability scores.

BACKGROUND: While decreased hip abductor strength, functional performance, and self-reported instability scores have all been shown in association with CAI, any sex difference in the relationship between these indicators is unclear. This study was to determine whether sex differences are present in the relationship between these indicators in individuals with CAI. METHODS: Thirty-two women and twenty-nine men with unilateral CAI took part. Hip abductor strength and functional performance were respectively assessed using a hand-held dynamometer and the figure-8-hop test. All 61 participants scored the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) for self-reported ankle instability. Independent sample t-tests and correlation analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Normalized hip abductor strength and functional performance measures for females were lower than for males. The self-reported ankle instability CAIT score, where higher values represent less instability, was significantly and positively correlated with both normalized hip abductor strength (p = 0.003) and functional performance (p = 0.001) on the affected side in females, but not in males (p = 0.361 and p = 0.192 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences were observed in that there were significant relationships between normalized hip abductor strength, functional performance, and CAIT scores in female CAI participants, but not males, suggesting that CAI evaluation and rehabilitation strategies should be sex-specific. HIGHLIGHTS: In females with CAI, hip abductor strength and functional performance showed significant relationships with self-reported instability scores. Correspondingly, in clinical practice with individuals with CAI, evaluation criteria may be formulated according to these observed sex differences. Sex differences should be factored into the evaluation and treatment of CAI individuals. Hip strength assessment should be employed with CAI individuals. Hip strengthening and functional hopping may be recommended for the rehabilitation of CAI, especially in female patients.

Running gait biomechanics in females with chronic ankle instability and ankle sprain copers.

Limited evidence exists comparing running biomechanics between individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and those who fully recover (copers). The purpose of this study was to simultaneously analyse running gait kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyography (sEMG) between ankle sprain copers and individuals with CAI. Twenty-six (13 CAI, 13 Coper) recreationally active females participated and ran shod on an instrumented treadmill at 2.68 m/s. We assessed lower extremity kinematics and kinetics and sEMG amplitude for the fibularis longus, tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, and gluteus medius muscles. Ten consecutive strides from the beginning of the trial were analysed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) independent t-test. The CAI group had significantly more ankle inversion during 0-6%, 42-53%, and 96-100% of the running stride cycle compared to the coper group. At initial contact (0%), the CAI group was in an inverted ankle position (5.9°±6.8°) and the coper group was in an everted ankle position (-3.2°±5.5°; p = 0.01, d = 1.5). There were no significant differences identified for any other outcome measures. Increased ankle inversion during the swing phase leading into the loading phase is concerning because the ankle is in an open packed position and inversion is a primary mechanism of injury for sustaining a lateral ankle sprain.

Ankle Instability Patients Exhibit Altered Muscle Activation of Lower Extremity and Ground Reaction Force during Landing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This review aimed to investigate characteristics of muscle activation and ground reaction force (GRF) patterns in patients with ankle instability (AI). Relevant studies were sourced from PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science through December 2019 for case-control study in any laboratory setting. Inclusion criteria for study selection were (1) subjects with chronic, functional, or mechanical instability or recurrent ankle sprains; (2) primary outcomes consisted of muscle activation of the lower extremity and GRF during landing; and (3) peer-reviewed articles with full text available, including mean, standard deviation, and sample size, to enable data reanalysis. We evaluated four variables related to landing task: (1) muscle activation of the lower extremity before landing, (2) muscle activation of the lower extremity during landing, (3) magnitude of GRF, and (4) time to peak GRF. The effect size using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for these variables to make comparisons across studies. Patients with AI had a lower activation of peroneal muscles before landing (SMD = -0.63, p < 0.001, CI = -0.95 to -0.31), greater peak vertical GRF (SMD = 0.21, p = 0.03, CI = 0.01 to 0.40), and shorter time to peak vertical GRF (SMD = -0.51, p < 0.001, CI = -0.72 to -0.29) than those of normal subjects during landing. There was no significant difference in other muscle activation and GRF components between the patients with AI and normal subjects (p > 0.05). Altered muscle activation and GRF before and during landing in AI cases may contribute to both recurrent ankle and ACL injuries and degenerative change of articular.

Foot Posture and Plantar Loading With Ankle Bracing.

CONTEXT: Arch height is one important aspect of foot posture. An estimated 20% of the population has pes planus and 20% has pes cavus. These abnormal foot postures can alter lower extremity kinematics and plantar loading and contribute to injury risk. Ankle bracing is commonly used in sport to prevent these injuries, but no researchers have examined the effects of ankle bracing on plantar loading. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ankle braces on plantar loading during athletic tasks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 36 participants (11 men, 25 women; age = 23.1 ± 2.5 years, height = 1.72 ± 0.09 m, mass = 66.3 ± 14.7 kg) were recruited for this study. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed walking, running, and cutting tasks in 3 bracing conditions: no brace, lace-up ankle-support brace, and semirigid brace. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We analyzed the plantar-loading variables of contact area, maximum force, and force-time integral for 2 midfoot and 3 forefoot regions and assessed the displacement of the center of pressure. A 3 × 3 mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of brace and foot type (α = .05). RESULTS: Foot type affected force measures in the middle (P range = .003-.047) and the medial side of the foot (P range = .004-.04) in all tasks. Brace type affected contact area in the medial midfoot during walking (P = .005) and cutting (P = .01) tasks, maximum force in the medial and lateral midfoot during all tasks (P < .001), and force-time integral in the medial midfoot during all tasks (P < .001). Portions of the center-of-pressure displacement were affected by brace wear in both the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (P range = .001-.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ankle braces can be worn to redistribute plantar loading. Additional research should be done to evaluate their effectiveness in injury prevention.

Syndesmosis Repair Affects in Vivo Distal Interosseous Tibiofibular Ligament Elongation Under Static Loads and During Dynamic Activities.

BACKGROUND: Ligamentous ankle injuries are the most common injuries sustained by athletes and by the general population, with an incidence of approximately 2 million per year in the U.S. Injuries to the ankle syndesmosis (i.e., "high ankle sprains") are generally treated operatively. Although cadaveric studies can evaluate syndesmosis fixation strength, they cannot predict how healing, neuromuscular adaptation, or dynamic loading will affect in vivo biomechanics. Using dynamic biplane radiography (DBR), we tested the hypothesis that syndesmosis repair would restore ankle kinematics and ligament elongation during static and dynamic loading. METHODS: A convenience sample of 6 male patients who had undergone fixation (2 screw, 3 suspensory, 1 hybrid) of syndesmosis injury were assessed with use of DBR during forward running, backpedaling, a 45° angled single-leg hop, and 1 static standing trial at 2 to 4.5 years postoperatively. Three-dimensional ankle kinematics and elongation of the distal interosseous ligament, anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, and the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament were measured bilaterally. Comparisons were made between the operative and uninjured sides. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with use of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. RESULTS: Static load increased the lengths of the distal interosseous ligament (p = 0.02 to 0.05) and middle segment of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (p = 0.02) in the operative ankle. The distal syndesmosis length was greater on the operative side during the static unloaded and loaded conditions (p = 0.02). Length of the distal syndesmosis on the operative side was greater than the corresponding healthy syndesmosis length during all 3 dynamic activities. On average, the operative ankle was in less dorsiflexion over the support phase of the angled hop (p = 0.05) and running (p < 0.01). The average Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living and Sports subscale scores were 95 and 88, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first in vivo evidence of post-fixation changes in biomechanics after syndesmosis repair. Syndesmosis repair fails to restore healthy static and dynamic distal tibiofibular anatomy, even in patients who report good to excellent clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acute Talar Cartilage Deformation in Those with and without Chronic Ankle Instability.

PURPOSE: This study aimed 1) to determine whether talar cartilage deformation measured via ultrasonography (US) after standing and hopping loading protocols differs between chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients and healthy controls and 2) to determine whether the US measurement of cartilage deformation reflects viscoelasticity between standing and hopping protocols. METHODS: A total of 30 CAI and 30 controls participated. After a 60-min off-loading period, US images of the talar cartilage were acquired before and after static (2-min single-leg standing) and dynamic (60 single-leg forward hops) loading conditions. We calculated cartilage deformation by assessing the change in average thickness (mm) for overall, medial, and lateral talar cartilage. The independent variables include time (Pre60 and postloading), condition (standing and dynamic loading), and group (CAI and control). A three-way mixed-model repeated-measures ANCOVA and appropriate post hoc tests were used to compare cartilage deformation between the groups after static and dynamic loading. RESULTS: After the static loading condition, those with CAI had greater talar cartilage deformation compared with healthy individuals for overall (-10.87% vs -6.84%, P = 0.032) and medial (-12.98% vs -5.80%, P = 0.006) talar cartilage. Similarly, the CAI group had greater deformation relative to the control group for overall (-8.59% vs -3.46%, P = 0.038) and medial (-8.51% vs -3.31%, P = 0.043) talar cartilage after the dynamic loading condition. In the combined cohort, cartilage deformation was greater after static loading compared with dynamic in overall (-8.85% vs -6.03%, P = 0.003), medial (-9.38% vs -5.91%, P = 0.043), and lateral (-7.90% vs -5.65%, P = 0.009) cartilage. CONCLUSION: US is capable of detecting differences in cartilage deformation between those with CAI and uninjured controls after standardized physiologic loads. Across both groups, our results demonstrate that static loading results in greater cartilage deformation compared with dynamic loading.

Physical Therapy After an Ankle Sprain: Using the Evidence to Guide Physical Therapist Practice.

The revised clinical practice guideline (CPG) on ankle sprain, published in the April 2021 issue of the JOSPT, addresses issues related to both a first-time lateral ankle sprain and chronic ankle instability (CAI). Recommendations were made for preventing primary and recurrent injury. Evidence was also presented to support interventions for patients with an acute or postacute lateral ankle sprain, as well as for patients with CAI. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(4):159-160. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0503.

Ankle Stability and Movement Coordination Impairments: Lateral Ankle Ligament Sprains Revision 2021.

This revised clinical practice guideline (CPG) addresses the distinct but related lower extremity impairments of those with a first-time lateral ankle sprain (LAS) and those with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Depending on many factors, impairments may continue following injury. While most individuals experience resolution of symptoms, complaints of instability may continue and are defined as CAI. The aims of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(4):CPG1-CPG80. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0302.

Greater knee varus angle and pelvic internal rotation after landing are predictive factors of a non-contact lateral ankle sprain.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the kinematic, kinetic characteristics associated with lateral ankle sprain. DESIGN: A 16-month prospective cohort study. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 179 college athletes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Joint kinematics, moment during single-leg landing tasks, and ankle laxity were measured. The attendance of each participating team, injury mechanism, existence of body contact, presence of orthosis, with or without medical diagnosis, and periods of absence were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants incurred lateral ankle sprain during non-contact motion. The Cox regression analysis revealed that greater knee varus peak angle (hazard ratio: 1.16 [95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.22], p < 0.001) and greater pelvic internal rotation peak angle toward the support leg were associated with lateral ankle sprain (hazard ratio: 1.08 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.15], p = 0.009). The cut-off values for each predictive factor were -0.17° (area under the curve = 0.89, p < 0.001) and 6.63° (area under the curve = 0.74, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A greater knee varus peak angle and pelvic internal rotation peak angle after single-leg landing are predictive factors for lateral ankle sprain.

Identifying Range-of-Motion Deficits and Talocrural Joint Laxity After an Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain.

CONTEXT: Approximately 72% of patients with an ankle sprain report residual symptoms 6 to 18 months later. Although 44% of patients return to activity in less than 24 hours after experiencing a sprain, residual symptoms should be evaluated in the long term to determine if deficits exist. These residual symptoms may be due to the quality of ligament tissue and motion after injury. OBJECTIVE: To compare mechanical laxity of the talocrural joint and dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) over time (24 to 72 hours, 2 to 4 weeks, and 6 months) after an acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Athletic training research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 volunteers were recruited. Fifty-five participants had an acute LAS and 53 participants were control individuals without a history of LAS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mechanical laxity (talofibular interval and anterior talofibular ligament length) was measured in inversion (INV) and via the anterior drawer test. The weight-bearing lunge test was conducted and DFROM was measured. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, independent-samples t tests, and 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 55 LASs, 21 (38%) were grade I, 27 (49%) were grade II, and 7 (13%) were grade III. Increases were noted in DFROM over time, between 24 and 72 hours, at 2 to 4 weeks, and at 6 months (P < .05). The DFROM was less in participants with grade III than grade I LASs (P = .004) at 24 to 72 hours; INV length was greater at 24 to 72 hours than at 2 to 4 weeks (P = .023) and at 6 months (P = .035) than at 24 to 72 hours. The anterior drawer length (P = .001) and INV talofibular interval (P = .004) were greater in the LAS group than in the control group at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in range of motion and laxity were evident among grades at various time points and may indicate different clinical responses after an LAS.

Male collegiate soccer athletes with severe ankle laxity display increased knee abduction during side-cutting tasks compared to those with only perceived ankle instability.

This study aimed to examine lower limb kinematics during a side-cutting task in male collegiate soccer athletes with severe ankle laxity. Forty-seven participants with a history of ankle sprains and perceived ankle instability were categorized into non-laxity (n = 17), laxity (n = 19), and severe laxity (n = 11) groups using stress radiography tests. Three-dimensional kinematic data during the stance phase of a 45° side-cutting task were analysed. The frontal plane kinematics of the knee significantly differed between the three groups (p < 0.05). The severe laxity group exhibited a greater abduction angle than the non-laxity group (p < 0.05). The horizontal and sagittal plane kinematics of the rearfoot differed between the three groups during the end of the stance phase (p < 0.05). Our data suggest that collegiate soccer athletes with both perceived ankle instability and severe ankle laxity exhibit greater knee abduction movement during a 45° side-cutting task compared to those with only perceived ankle instability.

Transient characteristics of body sway during single-leg stance in athletes with a history of ankle sprain.

BACKGROUND: The role of the measurements of postural stability in the context of screening for ankle sprain risk is still equivocal. Transient characteristics of body sway have been suggested as an alternative or an improvement to traditional whole-trial analyses. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are transient characteristics of body sway sensitive to the history of ankle sprain?. METHODS: The assessment of 30-s single-leg body sway was performed on a group of 93 athletes from basketball, soccer, tennis and running who reported at least 1 ankle sprain in the last 12 months, while a group of 244 athletes from the same disciplines served as a control group without an ankle sprain reported for the same time period. We considered the mean center-of-pressure (CoP) velocity, CoP amplitude and CoP frequency. In addition to traditional whole-trial variables, we calculated the relative differences between the 1 st and the 2nd (DIF_21) and 1 st and 3rd (DIF_31) 10-s time intervals within the whole trial. RESULTS: The indexes of transient characteristics of body sway (i.e., the DIF_21 and DIF_31) were in trivial or weak correlations with whole-trial variables (all r ≤ 0.29). Athletes with ankle sprain history exhibited smaller CoP ML velocity (p = 0.002) and larger CoP ML frequency (p = 0.001). In the injured group, the injured leg exhibited lower total and medial-lateral (ML) CoP velocity (p = 0.005-0.040), as well as lower CoP ML amplitude (p = 0.002) and higher CoP ML frequency (p = 0.010). The transient characteristics of body sway (DIF_21 and DIF_31) were very similar between the groups and between the injured and uninjured legs. SIGNIFICANCE: Transient characteristics of body sway do not appear to differentiate the athletes with and without a history of ankle sprain. Further research is needed to confirm if the transient characteristics of body sway could be used for detection of risk of falls in older adults or assessment of athletic performance.

Individuals with chronic ankle instability exhibit altered ankle kinematics and neuromuscular control compared to copers during inversion single-leg landing.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the ankle kinematics and muscle activities of the individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI), coper, and control groups in normal and inversion single-leg landings. DESIGN: cross-sectional study; SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Physically active adults with CAI (N = 12); and coper (N = 12) and control (N = 12) groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The participants performed normal and inversion single-leg landing. The muscle activity 200 ms before and after landing of the tibialis anterior, the medial gastrocnemius, and the fibularis longus (FL) were recorded. The FL latency, sagittal and frontal co-contraction indexes (CCI), ankle inversion angle at the initial contact, and the maximum inversion angle were recorded. RESULTS: Significantly longer FL latency, decreased FL muscle activity, frontal CCI, and an increased maximum inversion angle at post-landing were discovered during inversion single-leg landing in the CAI group compared to the coper and control groups. However, no significant difference was observed among the CAI and coper groups during normal single-leg landing. CONCLUSION: These results suggest prolonged FL latency and altered ankle kinematics suggest an increased risk of recurrent lateral ankle sprains in CAI with inversion single-leg landing.

Hip and knee muscle torque and its relationship with dynamic balance in chronic ankle instability, copers and controls.

OBJECTIVES: We compared hip and knee isometric muscle torque between individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI), those who have sustained one ankle sprain with no ongoing problems (copers) and healthy controls. Our secondary objective was to compare balance between groups and investigate the relationship between muscle torque and balance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: 22 CAI, 20 copers and 22 uninjured participants were tested. Isometric torque (normalised to body mass (Nm/kg)) was measured using a rigidly-fixated hand-held dynamometer. Balance was assessed with the Y-balance test. RESULTS: Knee and hip flexor and extensor, and hip adductor and abductor muscle torque was less in individuals with CAI compared to controls (standardised mean difference (SMD) >1.2). Hip and knee flexor and extensor muscle torque was less in CAI participants than copers (SMD: 0.69-1.1). Hip external and internal rotator torque did not differ between groups. There was no difference in hip or knee muscle torque between controls and copers (SMD: 0.01-0. 54). Balance was impaired in CAI participants compared to copers and controls in all directions. There was a strong positive correlation between posterolateral Y-balance test performance and torque of the hip adductors (r=0.53), flexors (r=0.52) and extensors (r=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with CAI have weak knee and hip muscles compared to copers and controls. Hip strength was shown to be related to posterolateral balance performance. Future studies may investigate the effect of hip and knee strengthening exercise on ongoing ankle problems, such as episodic giving way in individuals with CAI.

Ankle inversion proprioception measured during landing in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.

BACKGROUND: Research evidence has suggested that a more sensitive ankle proprioceptive testing method with higher ecological validity is needed for assessing proprioceptive deficits in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the test-retest reliability of a novel ankle proprioception assessment tool, the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus for Landing (AIDAL); (2) To assess whether AIDAL scores were sufficiently sensitive to detect proprioceptive deficits in chronic ankle instability (CAI); and (3) To examine whether AIDAL scores correlated with Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The AIDAL was purpose-built to assess ankle discrimination in four positions of ankle inversion (10°, 12°, 14° and 16°) upon landing from a 10cm drop. Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC) was employed as the ankle proprioceptive discrimination score. Seven-day test-retest reliability was evaluated with 23 university students (12 CAI and 11 non-CAI), and another 36 university students (18 CAI and 18 non-CAI) were in the comparison study. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability ICC score for the whole group was 0.763 (95% CI=0.519-0.892), which showed an excellent reliability level. ICC (3,1) was 0.701 for the non-CAI group (95%CI=0.210-0.910) and 0.804 for the CAI group (95%CI=0.451-0.939). The CAI group performed at a significantly lower level on the AIDAL assessment than the non-CAI group (0.777±0.05 vs. 0.815±0.05, F=5.107, p=0.03). The discriminative AUC value for the AIDAL test was 0.756 with a cut point of 0.819 (sensitivity=0.733, specificity=0.800). The MDC90 scores for CAI and non-CAI groups were both 0.04. Spearman's correlation showed that the CAIT scores were significantly correlated with the ankle proprioceptive discrimination scores (rho=0.401, p=0.015). CONCLUSION: The AIDAL showed good test-retest reliability for both non-CAI and CAI groups. Measuring ankle inversion proprioception during landing may be important for assessing the outcomes of CAI rehabilitation, as proprioceptive performance obtained from the AIDAL was significantly correlated with severity of functional ankle instability CAIT scores.

Copers adopt an altered movement pattern compared to individuals with chronic ankle instability and control groups in unexpected single-leg landing and cutting task.

Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) demonstrate altered ankle kinematics during landing compared to uninjured individuals. However, if copers may have adopted unique movement strategy to prevent repeated ankle sprains is unclear. The purpose of this study compares the lower-extremity joint kinematics and muscle activities of CAI (N = 8), coper (COP) (N = 8), and control (CON) (N = 8) groups in unexpected single-leg landing and cutting. Performance time (from initial contact to toe-off), number of mistakes in the jumping direction, low-extremity joint angle are assessed. Muscle activities were recorded from the tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, and peroneus longus (PL), and mean muscle activity, co-contraction index (CI), and PL latency were analyzed. Results of performance time and CI are not significant. Significantly less number of mistakes in the jumping direction and a shorter PL latency were discovered in the COP and CON compared with the CAI group (P < 0.05). The peak hip joint flexion angle is significantly smaller in the COP than in the CON (P = 0.04). In dynamic tasks requiring quick judgments of ankle inclination, the COP may be able to accurately sense the inclination of the foot. Additionally, movement strategies differed between the COP and CON groups in an unexpected single-leg landing and cutting.

Association between lower extremity muscle strength and acute ankle injury in youth team-sports athletes.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate lower extremity muscle strength as risk factor for an acute ankle injury in youth athletes. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Basketball and floorball clubs. PARTICIPANTS: 188 youth (≤21) male and 174 female athletes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1RM leg press, maximal concentric isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings as well as maximal isometric hip abductor strength were measured and athletes were followed for an acute ankle injury up to three years. Cox regression models were used in statistical analyses. RESULTS: In males, greater 1RM leg press and maximal quadriceps strength increased the risk of any type of acute ankle injury (Hazard ratio [HR] for 1 SD increase, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.12-2.39] and 1.43 [95% CI, 1.01-2.01], respectively). In females, greater 1RM leg press and difference between legs in hip abduction strength increased the risk of acute non-contact ankle injury (HR for 1 SD increase, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.03-2.02] and 1.44 [95% CI, 1.03-2.00], respectively). However, ROC curve analyses showed AUC:s of 0.57-0.64 indicating "fail" to "poor" combined sensitivity and specifity of these tests. CONCLUSION: Greater strength in both sexes along with asymmetry in hip abductor strength in females increased the risk of acute ankle injury.

The fibula and talus position difference in functional and mechanical ankle instability: MRI findings.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to use MRI to evaluate the fibula and talus position difference in functional and mechanical ankle stability patients. METHODS: 61 and 68 patients with functional and mechanical instability, and 60 healthy volunteers were involved. Based on the axial MRI images, the rotation of the talus was identified through the Malleolar Talus Index (MTI). The position relative to the talus (Axial Malleolar Index, AMI) and medial malleolus (Intermalleolar Index, IMI) were used to evaluated the displacement of the fibula. RESULTS: Post hoc analysis showed that the values of malleolar talus index was significantly larger among mechanical instability (89.18° ± 2.31°) than that in functional instability patients (86.55° ±61.65°, P < 0.001) and healthy volunteers (85.59° ± 2.42°, P < 0.001). The axial malleolar index of the mechanical instability patients (11.39° ± 1.41°) were significantly larger than healthy volunteers (7.91° ± 0.83°) (P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the above three indexes between the functional instability patients and healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: The functional instability patients didn't have a posteriorly positioned fibula and an internally rotated talus. The malleolar talus index was significantly larger among mechanical instability patients than that in functional instability patients. Increased malleolar talus index may become a new indirect MRI sign for identifying functional and mechanical instability patients.

Applicability of cutoff scores of Chinese Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure as inclusion criteria for study of chronic ankle instability in Chinese individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the applicability of Chinese Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-C) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM-C) as inclusion criteria recommended by the International Ankle Consortium (IAC) for study of chronic ankle instability in the Chinese individuals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative design with known groups. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 145 participants with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and 66 participants without injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CAIT-C and FAAM-C Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-C-ADL) and FAAM-C Sports (FAAM-C-Sports). RESULTS: The CAIT-C scores (18.2 ± 5.6), FAAM-C-ADL scores (97.0 ± 4.3) and FAAM-C-Sports scores (92.2 ± 10.3) of the CAI group were all lower than the CAIT-C scores (27.4 ± 3.1), FAAM-ADL scores (99.0 ± 2.1) and FAAM-Sports scores (98.4 ± 3.1) (P < 0.01) of the uninjured group. The recommended cutoff score of CAIT-C<24 by the IAC for identifying CAI had a sensitivity of 80.7% and a specificity of 84.9%. If the recommended cutoff scores of FAAM-ADL<90，FAAM-Sports<80 by the IAC as inclusion criteria for the study of CAI were applied, 97% of participants with CAI in this sample would be excluded. CONCLUSION: The results support the recommended cutoff score of CAIT-C<24 by the IAC to identify Chinese individuals with CAI for study. However, the recommended cutoff scores of FAAM-ADL<90 and FAAM-Sports<80 will exclude most Chinese individuals with CAI having only mild functional impairments.

Effects of 4-week impairment-based rehabilitation on jump-landing biomechanics in chronic ankle instability patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of 4-weeks of impairment-based rehabilitation on lower extremity neuromechanics during jump-landing. DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six CAI subjects (age = 21.4 ± 3.1 sex=(M = 7,F = 19), height = 169.0 ± 8.8 cm, weight = 71.0 ± 13.8 kg) completed 15 jump-landing trials prior to and following 12 supervised rehabilitation sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frontal and sagittal lower extremity kinematics and kinetics and sEMG amplitudes (anterior tibialis, peroneus brevis, peroneus longus, and medial gastrocnemius). Means and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for 100 ms prior to and 200 ms following ground contact. Areas where pre- and post-rehabilitation CIs did not overlap were considered significantly different. Kinematic and kinetic peaks and kinematic excursion were compared with paired t-test (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Following rehabilitation, CAI subjects exhibited less ankle (2.1° (0.8, 3.4), P < 0.01) and hip (2.0° (0.5, 3.7), P = 0.01) frontal plane excursion and lower peak hip abduction (2.5° (0.0, 5.0), P = 0.05). There was less ankle (5.0° (1.7, 8.3), P < 0.01) and knee (3.4° (0.8, 6.0), P = 0.01) sagittal plane excursion following rehabilitation. There was decreased peroneus longus activity from 9 ms to 135 ms post ground contact and decreased peak plantar flexion moment (0.08 N∗m/kg (0.01, 0.13), P = 0.02) following rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Progressive impairment-based rehabilitation resulted in reductions in kinematic excursion and peroneus longus muscle activity, suggesting a more efficient landing strategy.